1. What arguments does the author make?
Schools, specifically high schools and how they aren’t teaching anti-racial topics the way they should be taught.
White people should never use the N-word, but black people can decide what the appropriate line is for them.
There are other ways to fight racism.
He makes it clear that he is analyzing the problem from a white person’s perspective.
2. How persuasive do you find the argument?
His overall argument that black people can have their own conversations about when it is appropriate to use the n-word but that white people should never use it. He supports this with the example and further argument that teachers need to appropriately teach materials containing racial differences. He addresses the point that some people make that black people and white people have a double standard with that word but history has been a double standard and people need to get over it. He uses the analogies of Jeff Foxworthy, Seinfeld, and referring to Jewish jokes.
3. What is the author’s stance?
He is very clear that he is against any white person using that word in any connotation.
4. Does the publisher bring a certain stance to the work?
Boston College is a catholic college and they could have taken religious values into consideration.
5. Do you recognize ideas you’ve run across in other sources?
Yes, nearly form every large magazine including Time.
6. Does this source support or challenge your own position – or does it do both?
It supports our opinions.
7. What can you tell about the intended audience and purpose?
Audience definitely consisted of college students and the purpose was to generate conversation for the students there. Another purpose would be to reinforce the fact that y’all shouldn’t be using the word under any circumstance if you are white. The main purpose was to argue a certain point.
No comments:
Post a Comment